·
The goods and ideas that spread along the Silk
Road where spread in some interesting ways.
Caravans traveling the Silk Road took more than four months to trek
across the mostly unsettled deserts, mountains, and grasslands of Inner Asia
that stood between Sogdiana and China, carrying with them agricultural goods,
manufactured products, and ideas. Musicians and dancing girls traveled, too –
as did camel pullers, merchants, monks, and pilgrims. The Silk Road was not just a means of
bringing peoples and parts of the world into; it was also a social system. With every expansion of territory, the
growing wealth of temples, kings, and emperors enticed traders to venture ever
farther afield for precious goods. For,
the most part, the customers were wealthy elites. But the
new products, agricultural and industrial processes, and foreign ideas and
customs these long-distance traders brought with them sometimes affected an
entire society. I thought that it was
interesting to read that Travelers and traders seldom owned much land or
wielded political power. Also
considering the travelers were socially isolated and secretive because any talk
about markets, products, routes, and travel conditions could help their
competitors, they nevertheless though contributed
more to drawing the world together than did all but a few kings and emperors,
which was interesting. The Silk Road seemed
to be hugely important in the spread of Religion.
Suggested Prompt: Explain why the Persians could think the Greeks were not worth their time.
ReplyDeleteThe Persians were already in control of a large empire, spanning asia, the middle east, and europe. Greece at this time was not as large in relation to Persia but was very powerful. For Persia to take on greece would cost persia much money and resources for a victory that woudln't be guearenteed. Also, Greece was very advanced during this time period which would make it even harder. The greeks were very proud for being greeks. Even though Persia was relatively lenient towards the people they conquered, the greeks are a totally different story. The greeks would rebel until they gained there independence. Which would be a nightmare for the persians.
There appears to be a requisite hubris to empires. The Persians, the Greeks, the Romans, the Chinese, the Spanish, the Portuguese, the British, the French, the Americans, and all other empires that have at some historical point considered themselves to be the world’s foremost superpower all exude self-confidence bordering on arrogance. To be the most powerful nation state around, the citizens and rulers must believe themselves superior and will themselves into that position.
ReplyDeleteThe Persians had conquered much of the known world, connecting the Arabian Sea to the Aegean when they turned their attention to the Ionian rebels and a pesky bunch of warring city states. Why would they show any respect to the Greeks? Despite the self-assurance of the Greeks, the Persians boasted the most significant and formidable fighting force the world had ever seen, a population that dwarfed that of the Greeks, and had pushed the boundaries of empire building further than most others had in the ancient world. The crossed Hellespont to find a loose band of Greek-speaking farmers with no overarching government and who were best known around the Mediterranean as sailors and colonists. Invading Greece was to Xerxes what invading Russia was to Hitler or what invading Russia was to Napoleon or what invading Russia was to the Swedes in the eighteenth century. It was unnecessary: once the Ionians had been suppressed, the Persians should have seen to it that the Greeks did not revolt but not invaded. For those who have it all, what do you need? Why waste lives chasing something not worth it?